Decision Reflection Tool: Compare Choices and Next Steps

How the Decision Reflection Tool Works

Name two to four possible paths. Rate each from one to five for fit with your values, energy and present feasibility. The compass compares your own ratings; it does not draw a random direction or discover an answer outside the information you provide.

Keep the options comparable. “Try one class” and “change my entire life” are different scales of commitment. Rephrase them into steps you could realistically compare before assigning scores.

Comparing Priorities in a Decision

Without a selected priority, the three criteria have equal weight. Selecting one priority gives it weight three while the other two keep weight one. The score is the weighted total divided by the sum of weights. Equal scores remain tied.

Decision Example: Comparing Two Options

Suppose A has ratings 5, 2, 3 and B has 3, 4, 4. With equal weights, A scores 3.33 and B scores 3.67. Prioritizing values changes A to (15 + 2 + 3) / 5 = 4.00 and B to (9 + 4 + 4) / 5 = 3.40. The change reflects your chosen priority, not new evidence about the paths.

How to Use Conflicting Priorities

If the leading path feels wrong, inspect the ratings or a missing consideration instead of obeying the dial. A tie may mean you need a small experiment or another fact, not a forced winner. Add a next step for the path you want to investigate and copy it if you want to keep it after leaving.